Quantcast
Channel: Intel Communities : Discussion List - Wired Ethernet
Viewing all 4405 articles
Browse latest View live

Wire Bond Material

$
0
0

I'm looking for the material used for bond wire on part IXF440ACT or IXF440, an Octal Mac Ethernet Controller.

 

Thanks!


Re: No Internet Connection After Windows 10 Fall Creators Update (1709, 16299)

$
0
0

I've got the same today right after 1709 updates.on win 10 64bits
No stright forward solutions.

I lost the connectivity on the guest and the host
To recover the connection on the host I had to:
Disable Hyper-V

Delete the vEthernet interface

Delete the Etherent interface.

Reboot

-->Host OK

For Hyper-V guest

Initialy No chance to recover,
de-reactivating Hyper-v

Recreating the vSwitch did not help.
vSwicth was alwye coming back with status disconeted.

I finally noticed that the original Intel Ethernet driver was replaced by a MS 1709 ethernet adaptor version!.
I re-installed the Intel version and all strated to work like a charm.
Conclusion: MS Ethernet driver looks like ... pretty bad.
in my case:

Intel NIC: Intel(R) I219-LM

I used the  driver 22.9 (Downloads for Intel® Ethernet Connection I219-LM )

Here we go again - I210 and Teaming = Fail

$
0
0

After Microsoft's last update was pushed out, it wiped all my Hyper-V switches, Teams , etc. I have followed the instructions I have found on Intel's site for manually removing the invisible, but still in the registry, adapters. After re installing 22.9, the NIC's (2 x I210) install fine. When trying to Team, the attached error is all I get. I have to go in to Device Mangler and uninstall the disabled adapter.

 

Before Attempting to Team:

Before Team.jpg

During install:

During.jpg

 

After Install:

After.jpg

 

Top remove that disabled Ethernet 5 I have to go to Device Manager and Uninstall Intel(R) Advanced Network Services Virtual Adapter

 

Any help is greatly appreciated.

 

Happened with 22.7.1 also.


Z

Why the STP can reduce performance on teaming?

$
0
0

I made a teaming configuration with 2 NICs on motherboard under Windows 7.

I set them as Static Link Aggregation and also configure a network switch.

And I found that the network connection bandwidth became 2G on the Taskmanager as I desired.

 

But, when I made a switch test configuration test on the Windows, I found a message such like this.

 

"Spanning Tree Protocol has been detected on the network. If you want increase the network performance, You have to disable STP on the switch ports"

(I'm using foreign language version of Windows, So, It's not exactly same as display But same meaning)

 

My question is why STP can reduce the performance of teaming network?

 

And, I expected that I can see the 2Gbps of bandwidth during copy a file via network.

But, I couldn't see the bandwidth over than 1~1.2Gbps. Is this also related with this issue?

 

Waiting your advices.

Thanks.

Genuine Intel X550 but Yottamark MAC wrong?

$
0
0

Hello,

 

I recently purchased an Intel X550-T2 Network Adapter from a large online vendor based in City of Industry, CA.  The network card was sold by the online vendor themself, not a marketplace vendor.

 

I know that counterfeit cards are a real problem and I want to do the utmost to make certain my card is genuine.  I was excited to find the YottaMark on the back of the card.  I loaded up verify.yottamark.com, put in my code, and the code validates as valid.  It also points to the correct product type, correct manufacturing date, correct product name, and correct PBA number.  Unfortunately, the MAC address on the YottaMark page and the MAC address printed on the box/card label differ.

 

Should I consider the card counterfeit and return it?  I assume the MAC addresses should match between the actual card and YottaMark or is there some known issue with this?

 

Other than the MAC mismatch, the card looks very good.  The PulseJacks look laser etched, etc.

 

What is the best way to validate I have a genuine card?  How big of a problem is the mis-matched MAC address?

 

Thanks,

 

Barry

Using i1210's AVB capabilities

$
0
0

We are going to use the i210 in an AVB system.

 

The i210 FAQ mentions the following document:

Intel® Ethernet Controller I210 [Springville]– Traffic Shaping and Time Synchronization Technical

Brief (Document ID: 496740)

 

I haven't been able to find this document. Is there a way to obtain it?

 

Thanks,

 

Beni Falk

Can't turn off LED I219-V network adapter after shutdown PC

$
0
0

When shutdown my PC, I219-V network adapter's LED still flashing. I would like to completely off LED. I do not use Wake on LAN.

 

  • I disabled "Wake on LAN" in BIOS already.
  • I disabled "Allow this device to wake the computer".
  • I disabled "Enable PME" in Advanced tap.
  • I disable all "Wake on LAN" in Advanced tap.

 

My PC is Windows 10 and updated to the latest version.

Driver I219-V is the latest version from Intel.

ULP Tool

$
0
0

Hi all

 

i got a Maximus VII Impact with a bug on RJ45. The motherboard look good but the RJ45 is in "CODE 10" in Windows manager. I try many solutions but no one done. It's the i218-v component.

 

Solution 1 : Unplug all power cable and unplug the cmos battery => no effect

Solution 2 : Put Boot as normal in motherboard bios => no effect

Solution 3 : Disable rj45 in bios / boot / reboot / enable rj45 in bios / reboot => no effect

Solution 4 : Disable rj45 in Windows manager / reboot / enable rj45 in Windows manager / reboot => no effect

Solution 5 : Update rj45 in Windows manager => no effect because the rj45 is in "CODE 10"

 

i read there is a litlle tool named UPL Tool, tool able to flash the rj45 rom. I need it to try if i can repair this rj45 slot.

 

perhaps it will have no effect but i have to try on my motherboard. If anyone have other solution i'll appreciate a lot.

 

Kind Regards


QSFP+ Configuration modification is not supported by this adapter

$
0
0

Hello,

 

I have a XL710 adapter that I am unable to get setup.  I am trying to set the mode using the qcu64e utility without any success:

 

# ./qcu64e /NIC=1 /INFO

Intel(R) QSFP+ Configuration Utility

 

QCU version: v2.26.17.06

Copyright(C) 2015 by Intel Corporation.

Software released under Intel Proprietary License.

 

QSFP+ Configuration modification is not supported by this adapter.

 

Here is the adapter I have:

 

# lspci | grep -i xl710

81:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller XL710 for 40GbE QSFP+ (rev 02)

81:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller XL710 for 40GbE QSFP+ (rev 02)

 

Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks,

-J

ULP enable/disable utility. Where to get?

$
0
0

I have the intel i219-v error 10. Where can I get the ULP enable/disable utlity?

 

Thanks

Steve

ULP enable/disable utility. Where to get?

$
0
0

Same issue as seen elsewhere with the i218-V on a dozen Lenovo e550. Rather than going to two remote locations and popping the cmos on the lot, I'd like to give the ULP enable/disable utility a try.

Re: ULP enable/disable utility. Where to get?

$
0
0

I am looking for this utility also. Can you please send a link?

 

Thanks

Steve

X710 LLDP broken with ESXi

$
0
0

Hi. We have Dell PowerEdge 730s that have Intel X710 cards. LLDP does not work at all. Latest Dell firmware for the card and driver from the VMware HCL. We are running latest ESXi v6.5. I have noticed some threads that LLDP just does not work.

 

This is very important to us. Is there a time frame when this will be fixed? Thanks,,,

i210 blue screen on install and during operation

$
0
0

Hello,

 

I'm running Windows Server 2016 on a Asus P10 WS mainboard. This MB has two i210 network interfaces on-board. Currently, I'm using only one of them, the second one is disabled in Windows device manager.

 

The driver installed has a date of 08.12.2016 and a version of 12.15.184.0 (as shown in device manager.)

 

For the interface in use I have enabled teaming in Windows to use different VLANs. For a while now, there were two virtual adapters "Microsoft Network Adapter Multiplexor Driver #X" in my system, each configured with a different VLAN ID. This has been working quite well for some time now.

 

Recently, I tried to add a third VLAN. During configuration, the machine crashed with a blue screen. After reboot, the third virtual interface was there regardless. Now, I'm experiencing (seemingly) random crashes (blue screens) every once in a while. They seem to be more frequent when the new, third virtual adapter is being used a lot, but I can't really put my finger on it.

 

However, when I run the executable of the latest Intel driver package PROWinx64.exe v22.7.1, there is a reproducible blue screen as soon as the new driver is being installed. There is an additional popup by the installer that says something like "installing driver for i210 Gigabyte connection...". That's when the machine crashes consistently.

 

The memdump analysis says the following (first example is a "random" crash, second one is the "driver install" crash:)

 

***

Probably caused by : e1r65x64.sys ( e1r65x64+150ad )

[...]

DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL (d1)

An attempt was made to access a pageable (or completely invalid) address at an

interrupt request level (IRQL) that is too high.  This is usually

caused by drivers using improper addresses.

If kernel debugger is available get stack backtrace.

Arguments:

Arg1: 0000000000000028, memory referenced

Arg2: 0000000000000002, IRQL

Arg3: 0000000000000000, value 0 = read operation, 1 = write operation

Arg4: fffff8099451abdf, address which referenced memory

***

 

***

Probably caused by : NdisImPlatform.sys ( NdisImPlatform!implatReturnNetBufferLists+1d6 )

[...]

DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL (d1)

An attempt was made to access a pageable (or completely invalid) address at an

interrupt request level (IRQL) that is too high.  This is usually

caused by drivers using improper addresses.

If kernel debugger is available get stack backtrace.

Arguments:

Arg1: 0000000000000010, memory referenced

Arg2: 0000000000000002, IRQL

Arg3: 0000000000000000, value 0 = read operation, 1 = write operation

Arg4: fffff806566040b3, address which referenced memory

***

 

(Complete analysis logfile is available if anyone is interested.)

 

How can I fix this?

 

 

Regards

XL710: update not available. in fact it is available.

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I just downloaded new NVM bundle v6.01. But when I'm trying to run it I get:

 

 

# ./nvmupdate64e                                  

 

Intel(R) Ethernet NVM Update Tool

NVMUpdate version 1.30.2.17

Copyright (C) 2013 - 2017 Intel Corporation.

 

 

WARNING: To avoid damage to your device, do not stop the update or reboot or power off the system during this update.

Inventory in progress. Please wait [|.........]

 

 

Num Description                           Ver. DevId S:BStatus

=== ======================================== ===== ===== ====== ===============

01) Intel(R) 82599 10 Gigabit Dual Port  64.37  10FB 00:001 Update not
Network Connection                                      available
02) Intel(R) Ethernet Controller XL710 for5.02  1584 00:130 Update not
40GbE QSFP+                                             available

 

 

Tool execution completed with the following status: Device not found

Press any key to exit.

 

Why is that ? The version is clearly older.


MTBF for I350T4V2

$
0
0

Hello,

 

I am in need of the MTBF value for the Ethernet Server Adapter "I350T4V2" (Quad Port Copper).

Can some one please provide the value OR guide me to the specification where it is mentioned.

 

Thanks in advance.

I211/I217-V Windows 10 LACP teaming fails

$
0
0

Hello,

 

after the update to Windows 10 (x64, Build 10240) the creation of a teaming group (static or IEEE802.3ad) with a I211+I217-V NIC fails.

 

Drivers have been upgraded to the latest version available and multiple reinstallations with reboots din't help either. Whenever the group creation wizzard is used and a groupname (several tried), the adapters and LACP have been selected, a Windows pop-up appears to tell me group creation has failed.

However the Windows Device Manager shows a newly created "Intel Advanced Network Services Virtual Adapter", so some kind of configuration seems to get done.

Using Windows 7 SP1 x64 the exact same setup worked flawlessly for months, so Win10/the driver are the likely culprit.

 

Is anyone experiencing similar problems and/or is this a known bug? Feedback on this issue is greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks in advance!

 

Kind regards,

Famaku

Intel(R) Ethernet Connection I217-LM How many of VLANS can be made

$
0
0

「Intel® Network Adapter Driver for Windows* 8.1 」 is installed in the following personal computers.

 

PC:CELSIUS H730

OS:Windows8.1

NIC:Intel(R) Ethernet Connection I217-LM

 

How many of VLANS can be made in this environment?

I350-t2 Windows 10 bluescreen

$
0
0

Windows version: Windows 10 Pro

Version: 1703

OS Build: 15063.608

Intel Proset: 22.6

Network card: Intel I350-t2

Driver version: 12.15.184.0

Driver date: 2017-03-29

 

I have been trying for weeks to get Nic Teaming working on my Windows 10 machine.  However, whenever I try setup a new teaming, Windows 10 would blue screen with error code Bad_pool_caller. 

 

Any suggestion or help is greatly appreciated.

 

Thank you

 

Nelson

Why the STP can reduce performance on teaming?

$
0
0

I made a teaming configuration with 2 NICs on motherboard under Windows 7.

I set them as Static Link Aggregation and also configure a network switch.

And I found that the network connection bandwidth became 2G on the Taskmanager as I desired.

 

But, when I made a switch test configuration test on the Windows, I found a message such like this.

 

"Spanning Tree Protocol has been detected on the network. If you want increase the network performance, You have to disable STP on the switch ports"

(I'm using foreign language version of Windows, So, It's not exactly same as display But same meaning)

 

My question is why STP can reduce the performance of teaming network?

 

And, I expected that I can see the 2Gbps of bandwidth during copy a file via network.

But, I couldn't see the bandwidth over than 1~1.2Gbps. Is this also related with this issue?

 

Waiting your advices.

Thanks.

Viewing all 4405 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>